Machine transcription
-154-
tional cause during the First Afghan War. This great warrior, who
was not friendly to Amir Dost Mohamed Khan, took refuge at the
Qajjar court, and accepted the government of Herat for the sole pur-
pose of opposing Amir Dost Mohamed Khan, both as a rival and
an enemy of the Amir. No doubt in his temper and action, there is
more a mere suggestion of separatism, but in effect this is no
more than tendency of separateness which existed amongst all the
leaders during the 18th and the 19th century, so that in order to
appreciate this feeling, one ought to keep in view the time and the
circumstances that obtained at the time.
One of the young Sirdars, with a determination and warmth
of an Afghan spirit, who attract our attention during the difficult
times of the First Afghan War (1839. A.D.) and whose career lasted
upto the end of Amir Dost Mohamed Khan's reign (Tuesday 21st.
Ziqada 1279.A.H.) was the son of Sirdar Mohamed Azeem Khan, one
named Sirdar Sultan Ahmed Khan.
The life and work of Sirdar Sultan Ahmed Khan according to
historical analysis come under two heads, in these two phases of his
activities, a few years of his life as a refugee must also be counted.
Although these two sections of his life's activities appear as rather
contrary to one another, yet if one were to consider the real facts,
this apparent contradiction does not really exist in the mental make-
up of the Sirdar.
The role which this Sirdar has played in the period of the first
quarter of the 19th century belongs to that character which shows
him battling against the aggressive forces of the English, in de-
fence of his people from aggression, and his endeavours for the
expulsion of the foreigners from Afghanistan. The next phase
relates to that which concerns his adhesion to the Persian view
point. Circumstances had so contrived that this Sirdar should rule
over Herat, and from this small principality he should play a role
in the moving affairs of the east.
Roughly two thirds of characters agree with a modern printed edition of the same text. Much of the disagreement is editorial, not misreading. Treat the transcription as a finding aid and read the page image before quoting. How this was measured.
