Machine transcription
- 110 -
HOW THE GATEWAY OF THE GHAZNI
CITADEL WAS BLOWN UP.
ARTICLE TWENTY EIGTH
On the morning of 23rd. July 1821. A.D., when the sun had
not yet arisen fully, the walled city of Ghazni was shaken by an
explosion. The English had been busy the whole night digging a
tunnel and blew up the Kabul gate of the city.
Also they made a great breach in the walls, so that the
city surrendered without expectation to the enemy within three-
quarters of an hour. It was thought that this was effected through
the bravery of their troops, but the strength of a treasury is
greater than the strength and power of gun - powder.
* * *
The first aggression of the English, which took place with the
connivance and help of Shahshuja Saduzi, is a fact regarding which
several articles had been written in these series on several aspects
of the case.
In this article, we desire to speak as to how unexpectedly the
surrender of Ghazni took place at the hands of the English.
The British troops which were moving by way of the Bolan
Pass and Khojak with Shahshuja, were put under the command of
an English officer by the name of Sir John Kean. From the date
of the movement of this force ( 10th. December 1838. A. D. ) from
Firouzpoee, till it reached Kandahar on the 8th. of May 1839. A.D.,
and Ghazni on the 21st. of July 1839. A.D. With that which befell
the expendition, we do not concern ourselves here.
It is a matter of common knowledge that the legal occupant
the Afghan throne, Amir Dost Mohamed Khan was ruling the country
at the time, and the Government of Ghazni then was Placed under
one of his sons, Sirdar Ghulam Haider Khan.
As far as can be judged from historical records, Amir Dost
Mohamed Khan, both during his rulership as also prior to it, attached
great importance to the defences of Ghazni; so that when he ultimate-
ly became the king of Afghanistan, he appointed one of his real
brothers, Sirdar Amir Mohamed Khan, as Governor of Ghazni. In
Roughly two thirds of characters agree with a modern printed edition of the same text. Much of the disagreement is editorial, not misreading. Treat the transcription as a finding aid and read the page image before quoting. How this was measured.
