Machine transcription
- 117 -
The morning of 23rd. July found Ghazni in pools of blood,
and inside the city hell was let loose, for from every housetop
fire rained upon the attackers; every street coner was the danger
signal; every turn of the narrow passage was a battle field.
Whatever booty was secured was heaped along the Kabul gate along
the mounds of the slain Afghan warriors; whosever entered a house
for loot, did not emerge alive from that house; both inside and
outside neither party could keep any control, pandemonium reigned
everywhere. The above mentioned narrator adds that about one
thounsand and five hundred riderless horses galloped about,
and even fought amongst themselves. To step into the street was
to court positive death. The English writer, who took part in
the battle says that he had seen so much cruelty, and disregard
for human life that he disliked human behaviour, and that he
abhorerd humanity itself. Ghulam Haider Khan, the son of Amir
Dost Mohamed Khan-a young man of twentytwo years of age-the
governor and defender of the city was taken prisoner with his
six companions by Captain Taylor.
On the 24th of July the dead were buried, and two hundred
wounded and dead horses, too, were put under the sod. In the
afternoon the silence of death reigned supreme in the fair city
of Ghazni, doors were torn off their hinges, houses were demolished,
the streets were deserted, and it looked that it was not a city of
the living. Upon this silence sat the bloody regime of Shahshuja
under the banner and protection of the English, and from one of
the towers of the citadel flurted the ensign of the invaders.
* * *
THE VICTORY OF GHAZNI.
(An extract of a passage from TUHFATUL HABIB, Vol,2-page 168.)
" . . . . Shahshuja after the lapse of three months and
settling the Kandahar affairs and of its environs entrusted the
region to an Englishman named Leech and the Prince Fateh Jung, and
accompanied by other English officers started on an expedition
Roughly two thirds of characters agree with a modern printed edition of the same text. Much of the disagreement is editorial, not misreading. Treat the transcription as a finding aid and read the page image before quoting. How this was measured.
