Machine transcription
-26-
when the kingdom fell into the hands of his uncle Shah huja,
when he was again appointed as the governor of Kandahar.
After that date another chapter opened in the life of prince
Qaisar, which means a series of revolts which he set up against his
uncle; but the king repeatedly forgeive him in consideration of his
blinded brother-Zaman Shah. It is obvious, of course, that these
uprisings of the prince did not take place all by themselves.
Everyone knows that Shahshuja and Vazir Fateh Khan came
togather and parted several times; and on each occasion when the
vizir parted with Shahshuja, he betook himself stright to Kandahar,
so that he could incite prince Qaisar to take and to revolt against
his uncle the king Shahshuja. Also, it is known to every one that
in this the Vazir had an especial motive; for he was in fact in sea-
rch of a man from amongst the Saduzais, who could manage the
affairs of the government better. He exted the prince Qaiser several
times to see whether the young prince had it in him to govern
properly; but the prince coulde not acquit himself successfully in this
direction.
At long last, when the insubordination of Qaisar had gone bey-
ond endurance, the then governor of Farah, one name Haji Firzud-
din, with the order of the uncle of the young prince-Shahshuja-took
Qandahar form the prince. Shahshuja, however, arrived in Kabul and
nominaied his nephew to the governorate of Kabul. Meantime Shair
Khan, a former minister of Shahshuja, reached Kabul and induced
the young prince Qaisar to go forward to Peshawar against his uncle.
This Shair Mohamed Khan, had revolted against Shahshuja together
with his son, after the conquest of Kashmire. These min arrived at
Kabul in order to plot with one Ghayes Khan; but Shahshuja journ-
eying by way of Dera Jat also arrived at Kabul, and spoiled the
designs of the plotters. Shair Mohamed Khan and his co-operators
were klilled; and Qaisar, who had been hoping help from Persia was
also disappointed.
Roughly two thirds of characters agree with a modern printed edition of the same text. Much of the disagreement is editorial, not misreading. Treat the transcription as a finding aid and read the page image before quoting. How this was measured.
